Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture by Jaś Elsner, Michel Meyer

By Jaś Elsner, Michel Meyer

Rhetoric was once basic to schooling and to cultural aspiration within the Greek and Roman worlds. It was once one of many key features of antiquity that slipped lower than the road among the traditional international and Christianity erected through the early Church in past due antiquity. historical rhetorical thought is enthusiastic about examples and discussions drawn from visible fabric. This ebook mines this wealthy seam of theoretical research from inside Roman tradition to provide an internalist version for a few elements of ways the Romans understood, made and favored their paintings. the certainty of public monuments just like the Arch of Titus or Trajan's Column or of imperial statuary, family wall portray, funerary altars and sarcophagi, in addition to of intimate goods like kid's dolls, is drastically enriched via being put in correct rhetorical contexts created via the Roman international.

Show description

By Jaś Elsner, Michel Meyer

Rhetoric was once basic to schooling and to cultural aspiration within the Greek and Roman worlds. It was once one of many key features of antiquity that slipped lower than the road among the traditional international and Christianity erected through the early Church in past due antiquity. historical rhetorical thought is enthusiastic about examples and discussions drawn from visible fabric. This ebook mines this wealthy seam of theoretical research from inside Roman tradition to provide an internalist version for a few elements of ways the Romans understood, made and favored their paintings. the certainty of public monuments just like the Arch of Titus or Trajan's Column or of imperial statuary, family wall portray, funerary altars and sarcophagi, in addition to of intimate goods like kid's dolls, is drastically enriched via being put in correct rhetorical contexts created via the Roman international.

Show description

Read or Download Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture PDF

Similar rome books

Roman Portraits in Context

Никакая другая монументальная художественная форма не была так широко распространена в Римской империи, как скульптурный портрет, и его воздействие на городскую жизнь было значительным. Объединяя широкий социо-исторический обзор с полным анализом индивидуальных образов, их установкой и сопутствующими текстами, эта книга предлагает метод прочтения скульптурных портретов и их значения, даже тех, которые были давно изъяты из их первоначального контекста и теперь украшают галереи музеев.

Death's deceiver: the life of Joseph P. Machebeuf

Joseph Machebeuf has been overshadowed for greater than a century via his buddy and fellow priest, Jean Baptiste Lamy. during this biography Machebeuf comes into his personal, rising as an immense determine within the unfold of eu Catholicism during the American West. even if now not bodily strong, Machebeuf's nickname "Trompe l. a. Mort" ("Death's Deceiver") mirrored his positive nature and indomitable will.

Extra resources for Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture

Example text

Discussed at length by Kleiner 1985: 9–96 and da Maria 1988: 55–117. 13 14 Jaś Elsner monuments more generally, the Arch of Titus was making a claim to particular distinction. 32 Ēthos is embedded in the arch of Titus as the expression of the will to impress the audience by handling the question, which ramifies as the undisputed victory of Rome over Palestine, the depiction of the emperor as a true general (in defeating the rebellious Jews), and the presentation of Titus as a god. Pathos denotes not the audience as such, but the impact exerted by the monument itself on its intended audience: that is, the monument expects and circumscribes a certain kind of viewing – above all that its viewers be impressed by the laudatory achievements of imperial conquest represented.

G. Claridge 1993; Maffei 1995; Coarelli 2000. Note that the Column focuses on the wars for which Trajan was awarded his Dacian triumph of 106 and not the triumph itself; likewise although it contains his tomb, it never refers explicitly to the imagery of apotheosis. On Jews in Rome making pilgrimage to the artefacts taken from the Temple (and depicted in the Arch of Titus), see Noy 2005. The literature on the arch is vast and not without polemic. Recent accounts include Pensabene and Panella 1999; Neri 2004; Ross Holloway 2004: 19–53; Zanker 2012.

This archaeological uncertainty means we cannot know how the rhetorical process of the arch was originally intended to conclude: its peroration, as it were, no longer survives. We may say that the same considerations nuance the significance of the now lost bronze statue group that was placed above the arch. But, if the west front of the arch was its rhetorical conclusion as a base, then the entire monument may also be seen as the exordium introducing the statue at its peak. In this sense the viewing of the arch offers two kinds of progressive experience – a movement in linear time (from the east front and through the passageway) akin to the delivery or reading of a speech in linear time, and a movement of the eye with the body static from the base to the statue above (which is more of a structured synoptic view, as in a two-dimensional painting or relief sculpture).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.61 of 5 – based on 6 votes